Patrick Reed’s $750 million defamation lawsuit in opposition to a Golf Channel analyst, outlined

Patrick Reed’s $750 million defamation lawsuit in opposition to a Golf Channel analyst, outlined

Patrick Reed, who left the PGA Tour for LIV Golf in June, is now looking for $750 million in damages from The Golf Channel, and analyst Brandel Chamblee on allegations of defamation of character.

The go nicely with, which was filed on Tuesday, alleges that Chamblee and The Golf Channel “conspired as joint tortfeasors for and with the PGA Tour” to label Reed as a cheater, and extra mock his option to depart for the Saudi-backed {{golfing}} enterprise. The go nicely with moreover claims that Chamblee and the group “actively specializing in Mr. Reed since he was 23 years outdated to destroy his reputation, create hate, and a hostile work ambiance for him.”

Courtroom paperwork moreover embody every insult that has been hurled at Reed by means of the years, and that’s the place learning the go nicely with turns into surreal. Half 18 alleges that followers had been incited to yell verbal insults at Reed by Chamblee and The Golf Channel, and for individuals who’re questioning what kind of insults — well, they’re all listed.

  • “Now on the tee the excavator!”
  • “You suck!”
  • “You fucking suck!”
  • “You jackass!”
  • “You coward!”
  • “Shovel!”
  • “Why don’t you dig a grave and bury your self in it!”
  • “You piece of shit!”
  • “No person likes you!”
  • “Everyone hates you Reed!”
  • “Good luck digging your self out of this one!”
  • “The place are your dad and mother coward?!”
  • “You cheater!”
  • “Cheat!”
  • “Everyone hates you cheater!”
  • “You’re going to miss this cheater!”
  • “You cheat in college and on tour, you’re a little bit of shit!”
  • “Beat the cheater’s ass!”
  • “Sorry Webb for having to play with the cheat! Who did you piss off?”
  • “Why don’t you introduce your children to their grandparents you ungrateful b****?!”

I defy you to aim to study this document with out it sounding in your head similar to the jeering fan that Shooter McGavin hires in Utterly happy Gilmore to throw Utterly happy off his sport.

Now, clearly it’s not good to yell points at athletes — significantly the jabs at Reed’s strained relationship alongside together with his dad and mother (which has been documented so far), nonetheless nonetheless, it form of comes with the territory everytime you’re educated athlete. The large vary of references to Reed dishonest have adopted him for years. There have been longstanding allegations that he cheated in college, which he vehemently denies — nonetheless points really popped on in 2019 on the Hero World Downside.

In that event, Reed was penalized two strokes for attempting to reinforce his lie, after it appeared Reed was transferring sand behind his ball in a waste area. On the time Reed blamed the incident on the TV digicam angle, saying it didn’t current what he seen from his place.

The dishonest allegations picked up steam as soon as extra on the Famers Insurance coverage protection Open in 2021, when Reed obtained free discount after he claimed his ball had been embedded throughout the powerful. On the time Reed picked up his ball and marked its place, sooner than each different golfer or official would possibly confirm the ball was actually embedded. No penalty was assessed, as Reed did adjust to the proper pointers, nonetheless his historic previous, paired with an absence of affirmation, led to speculation that he cheated as quickly as further.

In 2019, after profitable The Masters, his dinner various included every creamed spinach AND creamed corn as sides — which has nothing to do with golf, nonetheless I ponder it a meals crime.

One among many go nicely with’s claims is that The Golf Channel and its analysts have conspired to destroy the recognition of LIV Golf and golfers who’ve defected from the PGA Tour to hitch the Saudi sportswashing advertising and marketing marketing campaign. Arguments will doubtless be heard throughout the Southern District of Texas Houston Division, and can set a precedent on what’s taken under consideration trustworthy, and unfair treatment of athletes by analysts and critics.

About the Author: camille r mercer

You May Also Like